home
***
CD-ROM
|
disk
|
FTP
|
other
***
search
/
Aminet 18
/
aminetcdnumber181997.iso
/
Aminet
/
dev
/
amos
/
AMOSList_0197.lzh
/
AMOSLIST
/
000001_amos-request@svcs1.digex.net_Wed Jan 1 06:51:13 1997.msg
< prev
next >
Wrap
Internet Message Format
|
1997-02-02
|
3KB
Received: from svcs1.digex.net (svcs1.digex.net [204.91.197.224])
by mail3.access.digex.net (8.8.4/8.8.4) with ESMTP
id GAA27487 for <mcox@access.digex.net>; Wed, 1 Jan 1997 06:51:11 -0500 (EST)
Received: (from daemon@localhost)
by svcs1.digex.net (8.8.4/8.8.4)
id GAA16032 for amos-out; Wed, 1 Jan 1997 06:29:26 -0500 (EST)
Received: from mail1.access.digex.net (mail1.access.digex.net [205.197.247.2])
by svcs1.digex.net (8.8.4/8.8.4) with ESMTP
id GAA16029 for <amos-list@svcs1.digex.net>; Wed, 1 Jan 1997 06:29:25 -0500 (EST)
Received: from relay-7.mail.demon.net (relay-7.mail.demon.net [194.217.242.9])
by mail1.access.digex.net (8.8.4/8.8.4) with SMTP
id GAA12931 for <amos-list@access.digex.net>; Wed, 1 Jan 1997 06:29:24 -0500 (EST)
Received: from mirex.demon.co.uk ([158.152.68.125]) by relay-6.mail.demon.net
id ab626211; 1 Jan 97 11:28 GMT
Received: by mirex.demon.co.uk (V1.16/Amiga)
id AA004fo; Wed, 1 Jan 97 11:24:07 GMT
Date: Wed, 1 Jan 97 11:24:07 GMT
Message-Id: <9701011124.AA004fj@mirex.demon.co.uk>
Message-Id: <23be0a55.u8t20e.78705-Braneloc@mirex.demon.co.uk>
In-Reply-To: <19970101.10360D88.101E3@penfold.fastlane.net.au>
(from Paul Reece <paul@fastlane.net.au>)
(at Wed, 1 Jan 1997 18:16:04 (+0500))
Organization: Mirex Software
Reply-To: Braneloc@mirex.demon.co.uk
Website: http://www.mirex.demon.co.uk
From: Keith Hill <Braneloc@mirex.demon.co.uk>
To: paul@fastlane.net.au
Cc: amos-list@access.digex.net
Subject: Re: Turbo Plus Ext
Status: RO
X-Status:
To the one known as Paul,
> > Dudes, I'm getting no reply from Manual Andre, the lead coder for Turbo Plus,
> > and you recall a month or so ago that Black Legend is gone without assigning
> > rights (the ppl who sold Craft 2 Turbo which = Turbo Plus) so it looks like
> > there is no further commercial interest in Turbo, so no harm in spreading it.
> no harm in spreading it? You obviously have an EXTREMELY limited knowledge of
> copyright laws. It doesn't matter if the author DIES - copyright still
> exists.
Sure. Copyright still exists. But who do you pay royalties to ? And if
no-one is selling, no-one gets royalties. So the author doesn't get paid
either way. Net resulting difference between not-spreading and spreading
software: More people get a copy, and the authors name lives forever.
> Spread the software and break the law.
True. ..but look at how many old programs have been put into the PD now..
_ _ _ _ _ _ | "Lifeforms, you tiny little lifeforms,
|_> |_| |_| |\ | |_ | | | / | | You precious little lifeforms,
|_> | \ | | | \| |_ |_ |_| \_ . | Where are you ???????"
| - Lt. Cmdr. Data - Generations
--------------+---------------
http://www.mirex.demon.co.uk